Jun 12, 2019
In the local bond space, ARA Asset Management bonds look attractive in terms of high yields, with Ask Yield To Worst for perpetuals above 5% and senior note around 4% as at 11 June 2019. We provide a review of the company and its bonds to share our views on whether they represent value.
The company is primarily a real estate manager with 4 main revenue generating segments: REIT management, Real estate management services, Private equity real estate management, and the newly introduced Infrastructure investments segment. From this business model, returns are mainly generated through management fees, which show a stable and recurring nature.
Revenue and EBITDA, consisting mainly of management fees, show a stable and recurring nature. They are mainly derived as base fees as a percent of gross property value as well as a variable fee as a percent of annual net property income of Assets Under Management (AUM).
As of 31 Dec 2018, the company manages 20 REITs in the Asia Pacific region, including listed names such as Fortune REIT, Suntec REIT, Prosperity REIT and Cache Logistics Trust. Revenue generation is from base fees as a percent of gross property value of AUM, variable fees as a percent of annual net property income of AUM, and one-off acquisition or divestment fees as a percent of gross property value.
Real Estate Management Services
These include convention and exhibition management services. Revenue is generated through property management fees as a percent of gross revenues or gross revenue and net property income of AUM, convention & exhibition service fees as a percent of gross revenues of AUM, and consultancy fees on project basis.
Private Equity Real Estate Management
The private equity arm of real estate management services. Revenue is contributed through portfolio management fees as a percent of committed capital, contributed capital or gross property value of AUM, performance fee, and return on seed capital.
Established in 2018, the company seeks stable cash flow generation through equity investments in medium-sized infrastructure assets, companies or platforms.
These large established stakeholders are seen as a credit positive as they build trust in the issuer.
Perpetual coupon rates above 5% are relatively high in the Singapore bond space and usually signal a riskier issuer. However, seeing that ARA’s income is generally recurring and would not constitute as lumpy or uncertain, why are its bonds priced with relatively high yields such as perpetual yields above 5%?
Firstly, ARA perpetuals have a higher risk of not being called on the first call date. This is due to coupon reset and step up dates being later than the first call dates, thus reducing the incentive for the issuer to call back the bonds at first call. Bond holders may be left with longer holding durations without additional reward. This bond structure is not ideal and presents a higher non-call risk, thus prompting a higher yield premium.
Secondly, when ARA was taken private in 2017, its disclosure requirements were reduced as it was no longer required to file annual and quarterly financial reports to the exchange as do public-listed companies. This lack of transparency of being a private company increases risk of uncertainties, thus demanding a higher rate of risk premium.
Healthy Debt Ratios. However, Coverage Ratios Require Management
The company’s liquidity and debt ratios are relatively strong with current ratio at 1.39 and net debt to equity ratio at 0.21x as at 31 Dec 2018. However, a large proportion of its capital is financed with perpetual bonds that are not accounted as debt, but still require recurring payments as dividends.
After including recurring payments for its perpetuals, ARA’s EBITDA to interest coverage ratio stands at only 2x, which is relatively low despite the company’s recurring nature of income. As the company seeks further expansion down the line, they might have to rely on new sources of financing to manage its interest and dividend payments.
Possible Positive Re-rating Of ARA Bonds
Management at ARA previously hinted at a potential re-listing IPO when the company reaches its AUM target of S$100 billion, set to be achieved by 2021. As at 31 Dec 2018, its AUM stands at S$80.1 billion. Although nothing is set in stone, a re-listing would be seen as a credit positive as it would reduce transparency risk when financial disclosure requirements increase.
As a private real estate management company, ARA Asset Management does not have a perfect comparable in the Singapore bond space. To analyse the relative value of its bonds, we use bonds in the real estate and REIT space with close maturity dates as comparables.
Comparing ARA’s senior bond ARASP 4.150% 23APR2024 CORP (SGD) with the following comparables, we think OUESP 3.550% 10MAY2023 CORP (SGD) looks more attractive on a return basis with similar Ask YTM yields but with an earlier maturity date.
However overall we believe ARASP 4.150% 23APR2024 CORP (SGD) offers an attractive yield among comparables with similar maturity dates after factoring in a higher risk premium as a private company. This is given the recurring nature of its income and having strong backing from established stakeholders.
Looking at ARA’s perpetuals, we prefer ARASP 5.200% Perpetual Corp (SGD) to ARASP 5.650% PERPETUAL CORP (SGD) due to the earlier coupon reset date of 2024. This translates to a lower call risk.
For comparable perpetuals, we use ones in the real estate sector with similar first call dates.
In comparison, ARA’s perpetuals offer an attractive yield pick-up from bonds with similar structure of reset dates later than first call dates (MAPLSP 3.950% PERPETUAL CORP (SGD) and FPLSP 4.380% PERPETUAL CORP (SGD)) while having a healthier debt to equity profile.
Compared to bigger names such as MLTSP 3.650% PERPETUAL CORP (SGD) that have lower non-call risk, we believe the higher yield for ARA’s perpetuals provide adequate reason to consider them as they provide decent yield compensation for risk.
We believe that ARA Asset Management bonds represent value with a good yield pick-ups for investors seeking higher yield. The company conducts a stable and recurring business and boasts strong stakeholders. Despite risks including non-call, relatively low EBITDA interest coverage ratios and lower transparency as a private company, we think ARA’s bond yields provide decent compensation when viewed against comparable bonds. In addition, future positive re-rating of ARA’s bonds may be on the table as the company may seek to re-list in an IPO in the future, which is seen as a credit positive.
For a quote on ARA Asset Management bonds or other bonds, kindly give our Bond Desk a call at (+65) 6212 1818.
These commentaries are intended for general circulation. It does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person who may receive this document. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of any person acting based on this information. Opinions expressed in these commentaries are subject to change without notice. Investments are subject to investment risks including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of the units and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Past performance figures as well as any projection or forecast used in these commentaries are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance. Phillip Securities Pte Ltd (PSPL), its directors, connected persons or employees may from time to time have an interest in the financial instruments mentioned in these commentaries. Investors may wish to seek advice from a financial adviser before investing. In the event that investors choose not to seek advice from a financial adviser, they should consider whether the investment is suitable for them.
The information contained in these commentaries has been obtained from public sources which PSPL has no reason to believe are unreliable and any analysis, forecasts, projections, expectations and opinions (collectively the “Research”) contained in these commentaries are based on such information and are expressions of belief only. PSPL has not verified this information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made that such information or Research is accurate, complete or verified or should be relied upon as such. Any such information or Research contained in these commentaries are subject to change, and PSPL shall not have any responsibility to maintain the information or Research made available or to supply any corrections, updates or releases in connection therewith. In no event will PSPL be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred from the use of the information or Research made available, even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The companies and their employees mentioned in these commentaries cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions howsoever caused. Any opinion or advice herein is made on a general basis and is subject to change without notice. The information provided in these commentaries may contain optimistic statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. You must make your own financial assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information provided in these commentaries.
Views and any strategies described in these commentaries may not be suitable for all investors. Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other units of PSPL or its connected persons and associates. Any reference to or discussion of investment products or commodities in these commentaries is purely for illustrative purposes only and must not be construed as a recommendation, an offer or solicitation for the subscription, purchase or sale of the investment products or commodities mentioned.